<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GRUNDRISSE=SKETCHES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>art, music, everyday life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Most Dangerous Woman in Amerika by grundrisse</title>
		<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2009/07/13/the-most-dangerous-woman-in-amerika/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>grundrisse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/?p=153#comment-772</guid>
		<description>Yeah, there was something about the Goldman Sachs thing in the paper yesterday. Now the government&#039;s going to act like, &quot;Oh, we didn&#039;t know that using taxpayer money to benefit finance capital would make the rich richer. It&#039;s cool, though, right? At least someone&#039;s eating.&quot; I can only hope it raises good populist dander by reminding people or perhaps indicating to them that TARP=unconscionable social disinvestment. 40 years ago we put a man on the moon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there was something about the Goldman Sachs thing in the paper yesterday. Now the government&#8217;s going to act like, &#8220;Oh, we didn&#8217;t know that using taxpayer money to benefit finance capital would make the rich richer. It&#8217;s cool, though, right? At least someone&#8217;s eating.&#8221; I can only hope it raises good populist dander by reminding people or perhaps indicating to them that TARP=unconscionable social disinvestment. 40 years ago we put a man on the moon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Most Dangerous Woman in Amerika by kristina</title>
		<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2009/07/13/the-most-dangerous-woman-in-amerika/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/?p=153#comment-770</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Another reason we shouldn&#039;t treat her as a joke (besides the fact that this isn&#039;t a joke) is that the more she is dismissed as incompetent the easier it is for her co-opt populist rhetoric.  And as we know, her whole political identity thrives on her regular-gal-ness.  So in a way I actually thought that the stories about her ill-begotten million dollar waredrobe were nice because they did just a little bit more to remind people that Palin is about making the rich get richer and nothing else (except maybe making racism more media friendly).  But it would be even better if we just recognized that fact directly.

and by the way, Goldman Sachs is reporting &quot;blowout profits&quot; today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Another reason we shouldn&#8217;t treat her as a joke (besides the fact that this isn&#8217;t a joke) is that the more she is dismissed as incompetent the easier it is for her co-opt populist rhetoric.  And as we know, her whole political identity thrives on her regular-gal-ness.  So in a way I actually thought that the stories about her ill-begotten million dollar waredrobe were nice because they did just a little bit more to remind people that Palin is about making the rich get richer and nothing else (except maybe making racism more media friendly).  But it would be even better if we just recognized that fact directly.</p>
<p>and by the way, Goldman Sachs is reporting &#8220;blowout profits&#8221; today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Eminem Song by kristina</title>
		<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/new-eminem-song/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/?p=150#comment-768</guid>
		<description>I think the worst thing about the video is that all of the cultural references are years old!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the worst thing about the video is that all of the cultural references are years old!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Same Shit, Different Day by kristina</title>
		<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/141/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-767</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Jones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Jones" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Jones</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bacon by kristina</title>
		<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2009/01/28/bacon/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but no one knows what scrapple is.  Also Salon.com covered the bacon craze last year.  But their analysis wasn&#039;t as good as yours, it was really just a bunch of links to different bacon related things.  Like this:
http://www.mcphee.com/resources/april/items/bacontux.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but no one knows what scrapple is.  Also Salon.com covered the bacon craze last year.  But their analysis wasn&#8217;t as good as yours, it was really just a bunch of links to different bacon related things.  Like this:<br />
<a href="http://www.mcphee.com/resources/april/items/bacontux.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mcphee.com/resources/april/items/bacontux.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bacon by grundrisse</title>
		<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2009/01/28/bacon/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>grundrisse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-764</guid>
		<description>Because scrapple is an unimpeachable signifier of working class authenticity (and most people from outside the Philadelphia tri-state area can&#039;t stomach it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because scrapple is an unimpeachable signifier of working class authenticity (and most people from outside the Philadelphia tri-state area can&#8217;t stomach it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bacon by Sul</title>
		<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2009/01/28/bacon/#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>Sul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-763</guid>
		<description>Why bacon?  Why isn&#039;t scrapple enjoying a similar resurgence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bacon?  Why isn&#8217;t scrapple enjoying a similar resurgence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-Fordism Is Not Anti-Worker by grundrisse</title>
		<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/anti-fordism-is-not-anti-worker/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>grundrisse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/anti-fordism-is-not-anti-worker/#comment-762</guid>
		<description>I intended my suggestion to &#039;nationalize&#039; to be provocative. I&#039;m just as leery of government intervention and mismanagement as the next guy, but major changes need to be made in Detroit, and the powers-that-be there need to be sent packing. The industry was already promised a $25 billion loan on September 30, but their business model is simply not sustainable. Apparently, GM has a net worth of &lt;em&gt;negative&lt;/em&gt; $59.938 billion dollars. How can you fix that? It&#039;s a vampire company sucking the lifeblood out of our economy. Now, I realize that U.S. taxpayers taking on this debt is not without risk, but it seems more wise to me than handing the management money and allowing them to continue doing the same thing that they&#039;ve been doing for the past 30 years--destroying the industry, betraying the U.S. and the globe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I intended my suggestion to &#8216;nationalize&#8217; to be provocative. I&#8217;m just as leery of government intervention and mismanagement as the next guy, but major changes need to be made in Detroit, and the powers-that-be there need to be sent packing. The industry was already promised a $25 billion loan on September 30, but their business model is simply not sustainable. Apparently, GM has a net worth of <em>negative</em> $59.938 billion dollars. How can you fix that? It&#8217;s a vampire company sucking the lifeblood out of our economy. Now, I realize that U.S. taxpayers taking on this debt is not without risk, but it seems more wise to me than handing the management money and allowing them to continue doing the same thing that they&#8217;ve been doing for the past 30 years&#8211;destroying the industry, betraying the U.S. and the globe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-Fordism Is Not Anti-Worker by Sul</title>
		<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/anti-fordism-is-not-anti-worker/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Sul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/anti-fordism-is-not-anti-worker/#comment-761</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that rebuilding from scratch would be a good thing, but why do you feel the need to nationalize it?  Why not let experienced auto industry insiders build their own companies from the ground up in a &#039;survival of the fittest&#039; type scenario?  I don&#039;t believe the government would do anything but add old ideas, a lack of innovation and too much bureaucracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that rebuilding from scratch would be a good thing, but why do you feel the need to nationalize it?  Why not let experienced auto industry insiders build their own companies from the ground up in a &#8217;survival of the fittest&#8217; type scenario?  I don&#8217;t believe the government would do anything but add old ideas, a lack of innovation and too much bureaucracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I love this shit by Sul</title>
		<link>http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/2008/10/19/i-love-this-shit/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Sul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundrisse.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-759</guid>
		<description>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/19/limbaugh-george-will-powe_n_135968.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/19/limbaugh-george-will-powe_n_135968.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/19/limbaugh-george-will-powe_n_135968.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
